PDA

View Full Version : There Will Be Blood/Oil!


muziq
01-24-2008, 11:07 PM
Just walked in the door from seeing Paul Thomas Anderson's There Will Be Blood. :tu

Set at the turn of the Century, TWBB is the story of Daniel Plainview, a self-made oilman, and his struggle to build an independent oil empire in the hurley-burley world of California petroleum. Daniel Day-Lewis, as you may know, plays the main character, and does a brilliant job, rendering Plainview as a multi-faceted persona torn between pursuing the all-consuming life of an oil magnate and being a respectable human being...and a good father. I'll stop short of a blow-by-blow recap of the story; instead, let me suggest that the story's arc is not unlike any number of classic Hollywood narratives like Citizen Kane or Mildred Pierce (two name only two)--one person's life story as defined by their phenomenal business successes and intense personal failures. It's a beautifully-shot film, full of the harshness of semi-arid S. & Central California, and might very well win multiple Oscars for its visuals, set design, and soundtracking and sound design.

TWBB is based on the Upton Sinclair novel, Oil!, published in 1927. At over 500 pages, Sinclair's novel is both more complex and more compelling than TWBB; the film discards at least two major plotlines that strip away the novel's intense and ever-so-relevant historical context, as well as its political perspective. Oil! was based loosely on the Teapot Dome Scandal and concerns itself more with the oil magnate's son--and his academic, romantic, and worldly education--than with the roughness of Daniel Plainview's existence in TWBB.

If you have the time and inclination, I strongly suggest reading Oil! and seeing TWBB close together, if for no other reason than to see the issues that arise in adapting an incredible novel into an incredible, but altogether different, film. Compared to No Country For Old Men, which is closer to being a word-for-word adaptation, Oil!/TWBB together reveal the degree to which a compelling situation and characters can render very different stories for our imaginations.

BTW: I don't envy the Oscar voters in their decision between Javier Bardem (No Country for Old Men) and Daniel Day-Lewis in the Best Actor category. I'd kill to see a remake of High Noon with the two of them as the main characters in the shootout. Huzza!

tecnorobo
01-25-2008, 06:47 PM
I saw this last evening. The more and more I think about the movie, the more and more I want to see it again. (it wasn't like that at first however).

I thought it was a great film. One of the most intense films I think I've seen.

ATLHARP
01-27-2008, 08:34 AM
Just walked in the door from seeing Paul Thomas Anderson's There Will Be Blood. :tu

If you have the time and inclination, I strongly suggest reading Oil! and seeing TWBB close together, if for no other reason than to see the issues that arise in adapting an incredible novel into an incredible, but altogether different, film.

Yes, and read "The Jungle" right before you grab a burger at Wendy's! A real eye opening experience!:pu

ATL

burninator
01-27-2008, 09:03 PM
I'll have to keep an eye out for this one. Lewis is one of my favorite actors.

Darrell
02-23-2008, 01:43 PM
This was one of the worst movies I've seen in a long time. It was nearly 3 hours of my life, I can never get back.

kheffelf
02-23-2008, 02:26 PM
This was one of the worst movies I've seen in a long time. It was nearly 3 hours of my life, I can never get back.

I would love more of an explanation on why you hated this film.

Darrell
02-23-2008, 02:28 PM
I would love more of an explanation on why you hated this film.

It was never ending, so much of what went on was slow and boring. It never had a climax, and the ending was pointless. I just think it could have been SO MUCH better.

heatmiser
02-23-2008, 03:49 PM
I fall in between you guys on this one. I thought the movie was alright but nothing to write home about. I do agree with Darrell in that the ending was absolutely pointless. If they finished the movie in a better manner, the movie would have stuck better with me.

Oh, if I remember correctly, the first 10-15 minutes there were no words spoken. Pretty strange IMO...

kheffelf
02-26-2008, 11:22 PM
It was never ending, so much of what went on was slow and boring. It never had a climax, and the ending was pointless. I just think it could have been SO MUCH better.

Finally got to see this movie last night, have wanted to see this film forever. The movie was fantastic. It was an awesome performance by Daniel Day Lewis of his character Daniel Plainview. Great character movie. Yes, I guess it may have come across as slow. Funny that Citizen Kane was mentioned earlier because there was a scene in the movie that reminded me a lot of a scene in Kane, can't remember it off the top of my head. Cinematography was awesome as well, definitely see why it one an Oscar. But the ending was not pointless, the ending was perfect. I'm finished.

smokinpoke
02-26-2008, 11:30 PM
Daniel Day Lewis one of my favorite actors of all times . Can't wait for the DVD

stevefrench
04-11-2008, 08:24 PM
I just finished watching this film and thought it was excellent.:tu

BamBam
04-11-2008, 08:35 PM
I love that actor who plays in this. He also was in Gangs of New York. He is intense.

mathil
04-11-2008, 09:32 PM
If IIIIII have a milkshake, and YOUUUUUUUU have a milkshake....