I don't know whether it's an extreme lack of sophistication, or extraordinary good luck, but in the approx 100 cigars I've had in the last three months, I haven't had one that was really and truly "bad". I've had two, maybe three that I've pitched due to excessive burn or draw problems. The very worst of the 100 just don't really have much flavor to them, except for the tobacco flavor, but I
like tobacco (shrugs). They aren't the ones you hand out when someone gets married or has a baby or gets their PhD, and I wouldn't buy them again, knowing what I know now, but even so, they're still not
u -inducing dog turds, not by a long shot.
But, I'm also willing to admit that I may just have a case of whatever is the opposite of "buyer's remorse", if that has a name. I really couldn't say. I've actually been thinking about this a lot, lately. I'd like to think it's minimal, but how much or our opinion of a particular cigar is really just subjective, purely ancillary BS that doesn't really have anything to do with the actual cigar? Where you bought it, what you paid for it, where, when, and with whom you smoked it, what your expectations were, how you felt at the time, mentally and physically, what kind of day you had at work, that kind of thing. That's a lot of complexity, and you haven't even lit anything yet.
And the cigars, themselves? Plants, weather, fermenters, blenders, rollers, inspectors, owners, shippers, distributors, they're all changing, all the time. Any one of them can radically change the cigar you are lighting up. You may not care for a cigar that you liked a lot, just a year ago, and one that you really hated four years ago may not be even remotely like the same one being made today. The complexities of the cigars, layered on top of the complexities of being living, thinking human beings.
I'm totally fascinated by people's beliefs and opinions, and especially how they came to them, and how much of it we're not even conscious of. Hope I didn't bore anyone to death. I'd feel terrible.